Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Lori K Johnson |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 3:2022cv00029 |
| January 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Caroline H Gentry |
| Sharon L Ovington |
| Thomas M Rose |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
First CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by Defendant Statement of Errors due by 4/29/2022. (Attachments: #1 Court Transcript 03-05-2022, #2 Documents Related to Administrative Process 06-13-2017, #3 Payment Documents and Decisions 06-13-2017, #4 Jurisdictional Documents and Notices 06-13-2017, #5 Non Disability Related Developments 06-13-2017, #6 Disability Related Developments 06-13-2017, #7 Medical Records Part 1 06-13-2017, #8 Medical Records Part 2 06-13-2017, #9 Medical Records Part 3 06-13-2017, #10 Medical Records Part 4 06-13-2017, #11 Medical Records Part 5 06-13-2017, #12 Medical Records Part 6 06-13-2017, #13 Medical Records Part 7 06-13-2017, #14 Medical Records Part 8 06-13-2017, #15 Medical Records Part 9 06-13-2017, #16 Medical Records Part 10 06-13-2017, #17 Documents Related to Administrative Process 03-05-2022, #18 Payment Documents and Decisions 03-05-2022, #19 Jurisdictional Documents and Notices 03-05-2022, #20 Non Disability Related Developments 03-05-2022, #21 Disability Related Developments 03-05-2022, #22 Medical Records Part 1 03-05-2022, #23 Medical Records Part 2 03-05-2022, #24 Medical Records Part 3 03-05-2022) (Stark, John)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington no longer assigned to case. Signed by Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 2/8/22. (jcw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Appearance by Shefali Baltz for Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Baltz, Shefali)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-8695141), filed by Lori K Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Raper, Robert)
|
|
Reset Deadline: Commissioner of Social Security answer due 3/29/2022. (srb)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lori K Johnson | |
| Represented By: | Robert L. Raper |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | John J. Stark |
| Represented By: | Shefali Baltz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
