Smith & Fong Company v. idX Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Smith & Fong Company
Defendant: idX Corporation, idX Dayton, LLC, JOHN 1-10 DOE and John Doe
Case Number: 3:2022cv00042
Filed: February 9, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Caroline H Gentry
Referring Judge: Thomas M Rose
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 5, 2022 Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Donald S Scherzer for Defendant idX Corporation (Scherzer, Donald)
April 4, 2022 Filing 15 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendants idX Corporation, UFP Industries, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent UFP Industries, Inc. for idX Corporation.. (Young, Jeremy)
April 4, 2022 Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeremy Young for Defendant idX Corporation (Young, Jeremy)
February 28, 2022 Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed re #10 (Mantashi, Omid) Modified on 2/28/2022 to link corrected document to original waiver of service returned executed(srb).
February 28, 2022 Filing 11 Clerk's Notice of Non-Compliance Local Rule 5.1 (c): The Clerk's Office has reviewed your filing, docket #10 Waiver of Service Executed, filed by Smith & Fong Company is not text searchable and therefore is not in compliance with Local Rule 5.1 (c). You shall refile docket #10 as a text searchable document, linking the document back to the original entry within 24-hours. Non-Compliance Deadline due by 3/1/2022. (bjr)
February 25, 2022 Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Waiver sent to idX Corporation on 2/10/2022, answer due 4/11/2022; idX Dayton, LLC on 2/10/2022, answer due 4/11/2022. (Mantashi, Omid)
February 16, 2022 Opinion or Order NOTATION ORDER granting #9 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Omid A. Mantashi Co-Counsel. Co-Counsel is directed to register for e-filing through PACER unless they have done so previously. Signed by Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry on 2/16/2022. (srb) Modified on 2/16/2022 to correct a clerical error. (bjr).
February 15, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-8724295) of Omid A. Mantashi by Plaintiff Smith & Fong Company. (Daugherty, Jonathan)
February 12, 2022 Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Counsel re #4 Notice (Other) Certificate of Service by Jonathan Dwayne Daugherty Plaintiff Smith & Fong Company (Daugherty, Jonathan)
February 12, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE by Plaintiff Smith & Fong Company re #4 Notice (Other) of filing of form AO120 (Daugherty, Jonathan)
February 12, 2022 Filing 6 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants, filed by Smith & Fong Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit exhibit 5) (Daugherty, Jonathan) (text searchable version of original #3 Complaint) Modified on 2/14/2022 to link text searchable document. (bjr)
February 11, 2022 Filing 5 Clerk's Notice of Non-Compliance Local Rule 5.1 (c): The Clerk's Office has reviewed your filing, docket #3 Complaint, filed by Smith & Fong Company and #4 NOTICE by Plaintiff Smith & Fong Company of filing of form AO120, and it appears that one or more of the PDFs are not text searchable and therefore is not in compliance with Local Rule 5.1 (c). You shall refile docket #3 Complaint, filed by Smith & Fong Company and #4 NOTICE by Plaintiff Smith & Fong Company of filing of form AO120 as a text searchable document(s), linking the document back to the original entry within 24-hours. Non-Compliance Deadline due by 2/14/2022. (bjr)
February 10, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE by Plaintiff Smith & Fong Company of filing of form AO120 (Daugherty, Jonathan)
February 10, 2022 Filing 3 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Smith & Fong Company, filed by Smith & Fong Company. (Filing fee $402.00 paid - receipt number AOHSDC-8715858) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit exhibit 5, #6 Civil Cover Sheet) (Daugherty, Jonathan) Modified on 2/10/2022 to show filing fee receipt information.
February 9, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan Dwayne Daugherty for Plaintiff Smith & Fong Company (Daugherty, Jonathan)
February 9, 2022 Filing 1 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiff Smith & Fong Company. (Daugherty, Jonathan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith & Fong Company v. idX Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Smith & Fong Company
Represented By: Jonathan Dwayne Daugherty
Represented By: Omid A Mantashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: idX Corporation
Represented By: Donald S Scherzer
Represented By: Jeremy Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: idX Dayton, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN 1-10 DOE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?