Mikolajewski et al v. Menard, Inc.
| Cynthia Mikolajewski and Edward Mikolajewski |
| Menard, Inc. |
| 3:2022cv00146 |
| May 31, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Caroline H Gentry |
| Thomas M Rose |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 (Copy of) ANSWER to #3 Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Menard, Inc. (Originally filed in Shelby County Clerk of Courts, under case number 22CV000082 on May 26, 2022). (srb) Modified on 6/3/2022 to correct date of original filing. (bjr) |
| Filing 3 (Copy of) COMPLAINT against Menard, Inc., filed by Cynthia Mikolajewski and Edward Mikolajewski. (Originally filed in Shelby County Clerk of Courts, under case number 22CV000082 on April 25, 2022). (srb) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant Menard, Inc.. (Kasson, D) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Shelby County Common Pleas, case number 22CV000082 ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-8886990), filed by Menard, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Service to Menard, #3 Exhibit C - Answer, #4 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet) (Kasson, D) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
