Moore v. Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
Defendant: Warden Madsion Correctional Institution and Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
Petitioner: Johnnie Lee Moore
Case Number: 3:2022cv00189
Filed: July 18, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Karen L Litkovitz
Referring Judge: Walter H Rice
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Mary Anne Reese for Defendant Warden, Madison Correctional Institution (Reese, Mary)
July 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER denying as Moot #1 Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and Vacating #2 Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Respondent shall file an answer conforming to the requirements of Rule 5 of the Rules Governing 2254 Cases within sixty (60) days of the date of filing of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 7/26/2022. (kl) This document and Doc. #4 have been sent to the Attorney General of Ohio, Habeas Corpus Unit of the Corrections Litigation Section c/o Brian.Higgins@OhioAGO.gov and Habeas.docketclerk@OhioAGO.gov.
July 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 PETITION Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody, filed by Johnnie Lee Moore. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Supreme Court of Ohio Documents) (bjr)
July 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Filing Fee Received: $ 5.00 under receipt number 300000034 (srb)
July 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ***VACATED, re Doc. #5 Order*** REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 7/22/2022. It is RECOMMENDED that petitioner's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #1 ) be DENIED and petitioner be ordered to pay the full filing fee of $5.00 within thirty (30) days. Petitioner should be notified that his failure to pay the full filing fee within thirty days will result in the dismissal of this action Objections to R&R due by 8/5/2022. (eh) Modified on 7/27/2022 (kl).
July 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Johnnie Lee Moore. (Attachments: #1 Certificate, #2 Inmate Demand Statement, #3 Petition, #4 Supreme Court of Ohio Documents, #5 Complaint, #6 Envelope) (jmb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moore v. Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Johnnie Lee Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Warden Madsion Correctional Institution
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
Represented By: Mary Anne Reese
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?