Dailey v. Kettering Physician Network
Plaintiff: Dr. William Dailey
Defendant: Kettering Physician Network
Case Number: 3:2023cv00191
Filed: July 10, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Thomas M Rose
Referring Judge: Peter B Silvain
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1986 Neglect of Duty
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND William Dailey against Kettering Physician Network ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-9499526), filed by William Dailey. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Mayell, Casey)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dailey v. Kettering Physician Network
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dr. William Dailey
Represented By: Casey David Mayell, I
Represented By: Peter Friedmann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kettering Physician Network
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?