Thurman v. Allstate Insurance Company et al
| Floyd Thurman |
| Allstate Insurance Company, Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company and Allstate Insurance Services, Inc. |
| 3:2023cv00314 |
| October 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Caroline H Gentry |
| Thomas M Rose |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #5 Complaint - Accordingly, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that the Court REMAND this matter to the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, Ohio. IT IS SO RECOMMENDED. Objections to R&R due by 12/28/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry on 12/14/2023. (srb) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Defendants Allstate Insurance Company, Allstate Insurance Services, Inc., Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company. (Meola, Margo) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Heather M Schisler for Plaintiff Floyd Thurman (Schisler, Heather) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand filed by All Defendants. (Meola, Margo) |
Filing 7
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Show Cause Response due by 11/21/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry on 11/7/23. (pb)
|
| Filing 6 Notice by Clerk of Southern District of Ohio of Pro Hac Vice Rules as to Attorney Benjamin A. Kling. (srb) |
| Filing 5 (Copy of) COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Allstate Insurance Company, Allstate, Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company, and Insurance Services, Inc., filed by Floyd Thurman. (Originally filed in Montgomery County Common Pleas Court, under case number 2023 CV 04896 on September 13, 2023). (srb) |
| Filing 4 Rule 7.1(a)(2) Disclosure Statement by Defendants Allstate Insurance Company, Allstate Insurance Services, Inc., Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company. (Meola, Margo) |
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY AND ORDER - This matter is before the Court upon a sua Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1(a)(2). Defendants have not filed a diversity disclosure statement as required by that Rule. Defendants are therefore ORDERED to file such a statement no later than thirty days from the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry on 10/17/23. (pb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendants Allstate Insurance Company, Allstate Insurance Services, Inc., Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company, Allstate Insurance Holdings, LLC, Allstate Insurance Holdings, LLC, Allstate Insurance Holdings, LLC, The Allstate Corporation, The Allstate Corporation, The Allstate Corporation identifying Corporate Parent The Allstate Corporation, Corporate Parent Allstate Insurance Holdings, LLC for Allstate Insurance Company, Allstate Insurance Services, Inc., Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company.. (Meola, Margo) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Montgomery County Common Pleas, case number 2023 CV 04896 ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-9645993), filed by Allstate Insurance Services, Inc., Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company, Allstate Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover sheet, #3 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet supplemental cover sheet) (Meola, Margo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
