Lasley v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Terrell Lasley |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 3:2024cv00029 |
| February 2, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Kimberly A Jolson |
| Walter H Rice |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to #S.D. Ohio General Order 22-04, there is no unanimous consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to randomly assign this case to a resident District Judge. (jmb)
|
|
Judge Walter H. Rice and Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson added. (jmb)
|
|
Filing 5
COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Terrell Lasley. (jmb)
|
|
Set Deadlines: Commissioner of Social Security shall file the electronic certified administrative record and answer or respond to the Complaint by 4/8/2024. (jmb)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Defendant must file and serve on Plaintiff a certified copy of the Administrative Record within 60 days after filing of the Social Security Identification form. Plaintiff must serve a Statement of Errors within 45 days after service of the administrative record. Defendant must serve and file a Memo in Opp to Plaintiff's Statement of Errors within 45 days. Plaintiff may file and serve a Reply Memo within 15 days thereafter. In cases decided by a Magistrate Judge upon the unanimous consent of the parties under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), appeals may be taken as provided by law. In cases in which the Magistrate Judge files a report and recommendations to a District Judge on the merits of the case, the time for filing objections and responses to objections is the fourteen-day period provided by 28 U.S.C. 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, unless modified by the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 2/5/2024. (er)
|
|
Filing 3
Statement As To Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form. The completed Statement As To Magistrate Jurisdiction Form shall be completed and emailed to the Court's Social Security Case Coordinator at, SSA_Coordinator@ohsd.uscourts.gov or mailed to: Office of the ClerkWalter H. Rice Federal Buildingand U.S. CourthouseRoom 712Attn: Social Security Coordinator200 W. Second StreetDayton, Ohio 45402DO NOT ELECTRONICALLY FILE THIS DOCUMENT, IT MUST BE MAILED TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS OR EMAILED TO SSA_Coordinator@ohsd.uscourts.gov. The completed Statement As To Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form due by 3/4/2024 (jmb)
|
|
Filing 2
CLERK'S NOTICE and GENERAL ORDER 22-04: Pursuant to #S.D. Ohio General Order 22-04, if no party indicates that they are withholding their consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction, the case will remain with the assigned Magistrate Judge for all matters, including entry of a final judgment. Further, the filing of a party's statement of errors or memorandum in opposition without first filing an executed copy of the Statement as to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form will also be deemed as consent by that party to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction over all aspects of the litigation, including entry of a final judgment. (jmb)
|
|
Filing 1
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Terrell Lasley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 SSA ID Form) (Rake, Michael)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
