Alford v. Rice et al
| Brian Keith Alford |
| Walter Herbert Rice, Jeffrey R McQuiston and Donald R Reidman |
| 3:2024cv00035 |
| February 7, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Michael J Newman |
| Peter B Silvain |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE Civil cover sheet (acw) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee: $ 405.00, receipt number 300002052. (srb) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Deficiency: The Court's docket reflects the initiation of the above referenced civil action. The initiating material contains the following deficiency(ies):Filing Fee Missing. The materials do not include the filing fee ($405) or a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (provided).Cover Sheet Missing. The materials do not include the required civil cover sheet (provided). Related Document: #1 Complaint filed by Brian Keith Alford. (pb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jeffrey R McQuiston, Donald R Reidman, Walter Herbert Rice, filed by Brian Keith Alford. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit G, #6 Envelope) (pb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
