Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Maria Miller |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 3:2025cv00451 |
| December 29, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Kimberly A Jolson |
| Michael J Newman |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 29, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 REPLY to Opposition re #7 Statement of Specific Errors by Plaintiff Maria Miller (Rake, Michael) |
| Filing 8 Response in Opposition re #7 Statement of Specific Errors by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. Reply to Opposition to Statement of Errors due by 6/1/2026. (Blower, David) |
| Filing 7 STATEMENT OF SPECIFIC ERRORS by Plaintiff Maria Miller Opposition to Statement of Errors due by 5/18/2026. (Rake, Michael) |
| Filing 6 First CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by Defendant Statement of Errors due by 4/13/2026. (Stark, John) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to #S.D. Ohio General Order 22-04, there is no unanimous consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to randomly assign this case to a resident District Judge. (jmb) |
| Judge Michael J. Newman and Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson added. (jmb) |
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Maria Miller. (sem) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Commissioner shall file and serve a certified copy of the administrative record within 60 DAYS after filing of the Social Security Identification Form and the Complaint as required by Southern District of Ohio Civil Rule 8.1(a), which copy shall function as the Answer. Plaintiff must file a Statement of Errors within 45 DAYS after filing of the administrative record setting forth the bases upon which reversal or remand is sought. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 12/30/2025. (vb)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Commissioner of Social Security answer due 3/2/2026. (sem) |
| Filing 3 Statement As To Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form. The completed Statement As To Magistrate Jurisdiction Form shall be completed and emailed to the Court's Social Security Case Coordinator at, [email protected] or mailed to: Office of the ClerkWalter H. Rice Federal Buildingand U.S. CourthouseRoom 712Attn: Social Security Coordinator200 W. Second StreetDayton, Ohio 45402DO NOT ELECTRONICALLY FILE THIS DOCUMENT, IT MUST BE MAILED TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS OR EMAILED TO [email protected]. The completed Statement As To Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form due by 1/28/2026 (jmb) |
| Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE and GENERAL ORDER 22-04: Pursuant to #S.D. Ohio General Order 22-04, if no party indicates that they are withholding their consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction, the case will remain with the assigned Magistrate Judge for all matters, including entry of a final judgment. Further, the filing of a party's statement of errors or memorandum in opposition without first filing an executed copy of the Statement as to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form will also be deemed as consent by that party to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction over all aspects of the litigation, including entry of a final judgment. (jmb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Maria Miller. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 SSA ID) (Rake, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
