Sheridan et al v. Menard, Inc. et al
| Martha Sheridan and David J Sheridan |
| Menard, Inc. and Community Insurance Company |
| 3:2026cv00113 |
| April 8, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Caroline H Gentry |
| Michael J Newman |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Defendant Menard, Inc.. (Schantz, Evan) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Change of Address by D Patrick Kasson (Kasson, D) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Change of Address by Evan Michael Schantz (Schantz, Evan) |
| Filing 7 Rule 7.1(a)(2) Disclosure Statement by Defendant Menard, Inc.. (Schantz, Evan) |
Filing 6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - Therefore, because a review of the Notice of Removal and Complaint suggests that the amount-in-controversy requirement may not be met, Defendant Menard is ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order why this action should not be remanded to state court for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. IT IS SO ORDERED. Show Cause Response due by 5/11/2026. Signed by Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry on 4/20/2026. (srb)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY AND ORDER - This matter is before the Court upon a sua sponte review for compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1(a)(2). Defendant Menard, Inc. has not filed a diversity disclosure statement as required by that Rule. Defendant Menard, Inc. is therefore ORDERED to file such a statement no later than fourteen days from the date of this Order. A sample "Diversity of Citizenship Disclosure Statement" is available on the Court's website. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry on 4/9/2026. (srb)
|
| Filing 4 (Copy of) ANSWER to #3 Complaint, with Jury Demand filed by Menard, Inc. (Originally filed in the Common Pleas Court of Miami County Ohio Civil Division on April 6, 2026, under case number 2026 CV 00100). (srb) |
| Filing 3 (Copy of) COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Menard, Inc., Community Insurance Company filed by David J. Sheridan, Martha Sheridan. (Originally filed in the Common Pleas Court of Miami County Ohio Civil Division on February 26, 2026, under case number 2026 CV 00100). (srb) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73 and 28 U.S.C. 636(c), the parties are notified that if all parties consent, a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form may be accessed at the following link: #AO-085. The consent form should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent form unless all parties have signed the consent. (srb) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendants Menard, Inc., Menard, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Menard, Inc. for Menard, Inc... (Schantz, Evan) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Miami County Court of Common Pleas, case number 26-100 ( Filing fee $ 405 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-10979253), filed by Menard, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, Email, Answer, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet) (Schantz, Evan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
