Wilson v. Oklahoma, State of et al
| David Lee Wilson |
| Oklahoma City, City of, Oklahoma, State of, Veterans Administration Hospital, Veterans Administration Hospital of Muskogee, Oklahoma, County of, Oklahoma County Board of County Commissioners, Oklahoma County Jail, Oklahoma City Police Department, United States Department of Justice, Veterans Administration Hospital of St. Paul, Federal Bureau of Investigation and Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation |
| 6:2013cv00117 |
| March 22, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma |
| Muskogee Office |
| Muskogee |
| James H. Payne |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
ORDER by Judge Ronald A. White denying plaintiff's motion for injunction for destruction of evidence ( 64 Motion for Permanent Injunction ) (lal, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER by Judge Ronald A. White granting motions to dismiss ( 38 Motion to Dismiss Party ; 38 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction ; 38 Motion to Dismiss Case for Failure to State a Claim ; 39 Motion to Dismiss ; 42 Motion to Dis miss Case for Failure to State a Claim ; 43 Motion to Dismiss Case for Failure to State a Claim), denying plaintiff's motions for default judgment ( 47 Motion for Default Judgment ; 48 Motion for Default Judgment)) and dismissing action with prejudice (lal, Deputy Clerk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
