Cases 1 - 10 of 14
WILSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv11862
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE WILSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WILSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15609
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE WILSON, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Igbanugo v. Minnesota Office of Lawyers' Professional Responsibility [OLPR] et al
as 0:2021cv00105
Defendant:
Wilson Law Group, Tommy Krause, Brian Aust and others
Plaintiff:
Herbert Igbanugo and Herbert A. Igbanugo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
WILSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv24013
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson v. LaPorte County Jail et al
as 3:2020cv00029
Defendant:
LaPorte County Jail, John Wilcher and Al Ott
Plaintiff:
David Lee Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00344
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Wilson v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 13-7061
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LEE WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY, COUNTY OF OKLAHOMA and others
Wilson v. Brewer et al
as 2:2013cv01511
Plaintiff:
David Lee Wilson
Defendant:
Janice K Brewer, Charles L Ryan, Sally Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Oklahoma, State of et al
as 6:2013cv00117
Plaintiff:
David Lee Wilson
Defendant:
Oklahoma, State of, Oklahoma City, City of, Oklahoma, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2011cv00820
Petitioner:
David Lee Wilson
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
