Pemberton v. Patton et al
Paul Pemberton |
Robert Patton, Justin Jones, Debbie L. Morton, Mark Knutson, Tim Wilkinson, Gentry, Williams, Rebecca A. Adams, Underwood and Corrections Corporation of America |
6:2014cv00511 |
November 20, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma |
Muskogee Office |
Hughes |
James H. Payne |
Steven P. Shreder |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 79 OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge James H. Payne : Denying 71 plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction pending the outcome of his appeal. (acg, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 68 OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge James H. Payne : Denying dkt no 58 Motion to Alter Order or Judgment. (acg, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 56 OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge James H. Payne : Defendants Tim Wilkinson, Corrections Officer Underwood, Rebecca Adams, Mr. Gentry, Mr. Williams, and Justin Jones are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for plaintiffs failure to serve them in accordan ce with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Defendants Robert Patton, Debbie Morton, and Mark Knutson are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to show they personally participated in the alleged constitutional violations. This action is, in all respects, DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), and this dismissal shall count as a STRIKE, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 34 48 49 (case terminated) (acg, Deputy Clerk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.