Ray v. Norwood
Petitioner: Eric S. Ray
Respondent: Joseph Norwood
Case Number: 6:2023cv00067
Filed: February 21, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Gerald L Jackson
Referring Judge: Ronald A White
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 BRIEF in Support of Motion (Re: #10 MOTION to Dismiss ) by Joseph Norwood ; (With attachments)(Herrmann, Tanner)
April 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss by Joseph Norwood Responses due by 5/4/2023(Herrmann, Tanner)
April 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Gerald L. Jackson: Granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion. Responses due by 4/30/2023 (acg, Deputy Clerk)
April 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion (Re: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 ) by Joseph Norwood Responses due by 4/24/2023(Herrmann, Tanner)
March 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of Change of Address by Eric S. Ray (acg, Deputy Clerk)
March 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Tanner Herrmann on behalf of Joseph Norwood (Herrmann, Tanner)
March 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Gerald L. Jackson, directing Respondent to show cause why the writ should not issue and file a response to the petition( Responses due by 4/10/2023) (Re: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 ) (acg, Deputy Clerk)
March 6, 2023 Opinion or Order HC FILING FEE Paid in full on 3/6/2023 in the amount of $5.00, receipt number 20986 by Eric S. Ray. (jld, Deputy Clerk) Modified to update to show filing fee paid on 3/7/2023 (adw, Deputy Clerk).
February 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER by District Judge Ronald A. White denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, Filing Fee due by 3/14/2023 in the amount of $5.00. (acg, Deputy Clerk) (Main Document 4 replaced on 2/21/2023) (acg, Deputy Clerk).
February 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER by District Judge Ronald A. White, referring case to Magistrate Judge Gerald L. Jackson for all further proceedings in accordance with jurisdiction pursuant to 28 USC 636. All future filings shall bear the case number CIV-23-67-RAW-GLJ. (acg, Deputy Clerk)
February 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Eric S. Ray Responses due by 3/7/2023(acg, Deputy Clerk)
February 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 THIRD PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 by Eric S. Ray (With attachments)(acg, Deputy Clerk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ray v. Norwood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Eric S. Ray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Joseph Norwood
Represented By: Tanner Herrmann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?