Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Hershberger v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Michelle Hershberger
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., Joseph Norwood and David Singleton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Patterson v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Carl Patterson
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., Joseph Norwood, Connor Whitlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Drew v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 6:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
Tyrese Drew
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., James Yates, Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hayes v. Norwood
as 23-6089
Petitioner / Appellant:
WENDELL MONTRELL HAYES
Respondent / Appellee:
JOSEPH NORWOOD
Ray v. Norwood
as 6:2023cv00067
Petitioner:
Eric S. Ray
Respondent:
Joseph Norwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Loggins v. Norwood, et al
as 20-3009
Defendant / Appellee:
DAN SCHNURR, Warden, Hutchinson Correctional Facility, KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOSEPH NORWOOD, Secretary of Corrections, Kansas Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN D. LOGGINS, SR.
J.B. v. America et al
as 1:2019cv03924
Defendant:
Jermaine Darden, Warden Herman Quay, John/Jane Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
J. B.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Loggins v. Norwood, et al
as 19-3051
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH NORWOOD, DAN SCHNURR and SHANNON MEYER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN D. LOGGINS, SR.
Loggins (ID 63088) v. Pilshaw et al
as 5:2018cv03254
Defendant:
Richard Ranzau, Thomas Malone, J. Patrick Walter and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin D. Loggins, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
A.P. v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv04661
Plaintiff:
A. P.
Defendant:
John/Jane Does 1-10, D'Anello Smith, Herman Quay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
