Ali v Duboise et al
Murtaza Ali |
Duboise, Lambert, Kaiser, John Doe and Armor Medical Services |
4:2016cv00027 |
January 15, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
Tulsa Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Claire V Eagan |
Frank H McCarthy |
Conditions of Confinement |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 205 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan - Plaintiff's "motion requesting an order for his presence at jury trial on August 17, 2020" (Dkt. # 203) is denied. Defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. # 200) is held und er advisement until August 7, 2020. On or before August 6, 2020, plaintiff shall file with the Court a copy of the written consent of the United States Attorney General, or his designee, granting plaintiff permission to reapply for admission to the U nited States. If plaintiff fails to file with the Court a copy of the written consent of the United States Attorney General, or his designee, granting plaintiff permission to reapply for admission to the United States, the Court will rule on defendan ts' motion to dismiss (Dkt. # 200), and the Court will grant defendants' request to dismiss this case with prejudice for the reasons stated in this order. ; taking motion(s) under advisement; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s ): ( Miscellaneous Deadline set for 8/6/2020); denying 203 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (Re: 200 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution , 203 MOTION Requesting an Order for His Presence at Jury Trial on August 17, 2020 ) (RGG, Chambers) |
Filing 115 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan - The motion to dismiss (Dkt. # 86) is denied. Within 14 days of the entry of this opinion and order, Kaiser shall file an answer to the amended complaint with respect to the excessive-force claim alleged against him in count II of the amended complaint (Dkt. # 83). ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Miscellaneous Deadline set for 5/9/2019); denying 86 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Re: 83 Amended Complaint ) (RGG, Chambers) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.