Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Lambert v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 8:2026cv02707
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Lambert
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Bhoge v. Frenkel Lambert Weiss Weisman & Gordon LLP
as 26-2568
Plaintiff:
INDIRA D. BHOGE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
FRENKEL LAMBERT WEISS WEISMAN & GORDON LLP, MIDFIRST BANK, JOHN AND JANE DOE, investors 1-10 and others
LAMBERT v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 2:2026cv01992
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LAMBERT
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Dunn v. French et al
as 2:2026cv02046
Plaintiff:
Damien Dunn
Defendant:
Brittney French, Kevin Kellum, Jordan Lambert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Dorletha Lambert v. Dexter Payne, et al
as 26-2834
Plaintiff:
Dorletha Lasha Lambert
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections, Nurzuhal Faust, Warden, McPherson Women's Unit, Jamie Campbell, APN, McPherson Medical Unit and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv02569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Lambert v. Bisignano
as 4:2026cv07558
Plaintiff:
Brian Thomas Lambert
Defendant:
Frank J Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lambert v. Warner
as 2:2026cv03136
Petitioner:
Joshua Lambert
Respondent:
Jack Warner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00431
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
