Lundy v. Martin
Petitioner: Dameon Tyreese Lundy and Dameon Tyrese Lundy
Respondent: Terry Martin and Jimmy Martin
Case Number: 4:2019cv00322
Filed: June 17, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Frank H McCarthy
Referring Judge: James H Payne
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 COPIES OF STATE COURT HABEAS TRANSCRIPT(S)/RECORD(S) by Jimmy Martin (jln, Dpty Clk)
July 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Service (Re: #7 State Court Habeas Transcript(s)/Record(s), #6 Response in Opposition to Motion ) by Jimmy Martin (Kosmider, Emily)
July 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 COPIES OF STATE COURT HABEAS TRANSCRIPT(S)/RECORD(S) by Jimmy Martin (With attachments) (Kosmider, Emily)
July 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion (Re: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 ) by Jimmy Martin ; (With attachments) (Kosmider, Emily)
June 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE of Change of Address by Dameon Tyreese Lundy (dlg, Dpty Clk)
June 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Emily Brooks Kosmider on behalf of Jimmy Martin [Note: Attorney Emily Brooks Kosmider added to party Jimmy Martin(pty:res).] (Kosmider, Emily)
June 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER by Judge James H Payne , adding party Jimmy Martin terminating party Terry Martin, directing Respondent to show cause why the writ should not issue and file a response to the petition( Responses due by 7/22/2019, Replies due by 8/21/2019) (Re: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 ) (pll, Dpty Clk)
June 20, 2019 Opinion or Order ***Remark: Emailed docket numbers 1 and 3 to the Office of the Attorney General at fhc.docket@oag.ok.gov (Re: #3 Order,, Adding/Terminating Party(ies),, Directing Respondent to Show Cause re: PWHC, ) (sc, Dpty Clk)
June 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 FILING FEES Paid in Full by Dameon Tyreese Lundy (dlg, Dpty Clk)
June 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 by Dameon Tyreese Lundy (dlg, Dpty Clk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lundy v. Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Dameon Tyreese Lundy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Dameon Tyrese Lundy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Terry Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jimmy Martin
Represented By: Emily Brooks Kosmider
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?