Luginbyhl v. State of Oklahoma, The et al
| Levi McRae Luginbyhl |
| Tulsa County District Court of Oklahoma, Tulsa Prosecutors Office and State of Oklahoma, The |
| 4:2019cv00478 |
| August 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| John E Dowdell |
| Frank H McCarthy |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MAIL to Levi McRae Luginbyhl Returned - remailed on 10/07/19 to 11644 N 103rd E Ave Collinsville OK 74021 - new address obtained from USPO. (Re: #2 Order,, Dismissing/Terminating Case,,, ) (dlg, Dpty Clk) |
| ***Civil Case Terminated (see document number #3 ) (sac, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 3 JUDGMENT by Chief Judge John E Dowdell (OF DISMISSAL), entering judgment in favor of Defendants against Plaintiff (terminates case) (Re: #2 Order,, Dismissing/Terminating Case,,, ) (SAS, Chambers) |
Filing 2
ORDER by Chief Judge John E Dowdell Plaintiff's pleading is construed as a 42 U.S.C. 1983 civil rights complaint and, pursuant to the three-strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g), this action is dismissed without prejudice to refiling with advance payment of the full $400 filing fee., dismissing/terminating case (terminates case) (Re: #1 Complaint ) (SAS, Chambers)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Levi McRae Luginbyhl (sc, Dpty Clk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
