Cases 1 - 10 of 1,929
Hutchison et al v. State of Oklahoma, The et al
as 4:2024cv00558
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, The, Grove Municpal Airport Managing Authority, The, Oklahoma Aeronautics Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W Hutchison and Halee A Hutchison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. State of Oklahoma
as 6:2024cv00450
Petitioner:
Rickey White
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Kentucky et al v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission et al
as 3:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
State of Arkansas, State of Montana, State of Texas and others
Defendant:
Hester M. Peirce, Caroline A. Crenshaw, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
White v. State of Oklahoma
as 6:2024cv00441
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Petitioner:
Rickey White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Franklin v. State of Oklahoma
as 24-6225
Petitioner:
JAMES HASTEN FRANKLIN
Respondent:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Jameson v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 6:2024cv00405
Defendant:
Kevin Ledbetter, McIntosh County Board of County Commissioners, Monica Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Floyd Jameson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Medtronic, Inc.
as 24-2766
Plaintiff:
STATE OF DELAWARE, THE STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF MONTANA and others
Defendant:
MEDTRONIC, INC., MEDTRONIC USA INC., MEDTRONIC MINIMED INC. and others
Bateholts v. Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
as 5:2024cv01099
Petitioner:
Charles Allen Bateholts
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thornbrough v. DOC of the State of Oklahoma
as 6:2024cv00387
Respondent:
DOC of the State of Oklahoma
Petitioner:
Matthew Elijah Thornbrough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
