Thlopthlocco Tribal Town, The v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
Thlopthlocco Tribal Town, The |
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc., Specgx, LLC, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC, Morris & Dickson Co, LLC, Mallinckrodt PLC, Purdue Frederick Company, The, Wal-Mart Inc., Actavis PLC, TEVA Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Actavis LLC, Allergan PLC, TEVA Pharmaceuticals Industries, LTD, Cardinal Health, Inc., Actavis Pharma, Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc., Purdue Pharma Inc., Walgreen Co., Cephalon, Inc., Endo Health Solutions Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., McKesson Corp., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Watson Pharma, Inc., H.D. Smith Wholesale Drug Company, SAJ Distributors, Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc., Amerisourcebergen Drug Corp., Teva Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., Endo Pharmaceutical, Inc. and Sandoz Inc. |
4:2019cv00557 |
October 21, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
Gregory K Frizzell |
Frank H McCarthy |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Cardinal Health, Inc. (Ray, Ryan) |
Filing 7 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Ryan A Ray on behalf of Cardinal Health, Inc. (Ray, Ryan) |
Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Frederick Company, The, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., McKesson Corp., Cardinal Health, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Corp., Purdue Pharma Inc. to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCvP 7.1 within seven (7) days of this order, if they have not already done so. The parties shall use the form entitled Corporate Disclosure Statement available on the Courts website (please do not refile if already filed on non-court form unless directed to do so). If you have already filed your Corporate Disclosure Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Corporate Disclosure Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (jjs, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , : Pursuant to Local Rule 81.2, the removing party(ies) shall file a Status Report on Removed Action within five (5) days of the filing of the notice of removal in the U.S. District Court. The form is available on the Court's website. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (jjs, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by McKesson Corp. (Campbell, Stuart) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Stuart Douglas Campbell on behalf of McKesson Corp. (Campbell, Stuart) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Removal from Creek County, case number BCJ-2019-21 (paid $400 filing fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2124510) by McKesson Corp. (With attachments) (Campbell, Stuart) |
Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by McKesson Corp. [Note: Attorney Stuart Douglas Campbell added to party McKesson Corp.(pty:dft).] (Campbell, Stuart) |
PETITION/COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed in State Court against All Defendants by Thlopthlocco Tribal Town, The (jjs, Dpty Clk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.