Dilbeck v. Instant Brands, Inc.
Plaintiff: Amanda Dilbeck
Defendant: Instant Brands, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2021cv00403
Filed: September 20, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Gregory K Frizzell
Referring Judge: Jodi F Jayne
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 12, 2021 Filing 18 ANSWER with Jury Demand (Re: #2 Complaint ) by Instant Brands, Inc. (Threlkeld, C)
November 2, 2021 Filing 17 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Adam A Milasincic on behalf of Amanda Dilbeck (Milasincic, Adam)
October 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MINUTE ORDER by Judge Gregory K Frizzell granting Plaintiff's Motions for Admission Pro Hac Vice and ; adding attorney Robert E Ammons,Adam Milasincic for Amanda Dilbeck ; granting #12 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice; granting #13 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (kjp, Dpty Clk)
October 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER by Judge Gregory K Frizzell granting Unopposed Motion for Further Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint [Doc. 14]; Answer deadline extended to 11/12/2021 ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Miscellaneous Deadline set for 11/12/2021); granting #14 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (GKF1, Chambers)
October 28, 2021 Filing 14 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer (Re: #2 Complaint ) by Instant Brands, Inc. (Threlkeld, C)
October 28, 2021 Filing 13 MOTION for Attorney(s) Adam Milasincic to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $50 PHV fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2503181) by Amanda Dilbeck (With attachments) (Carr, Michael)
October 28, 2021 Filing 12 MOTION for Attorney(s) Robert E. Ammons to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $50 PHV fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2503154) by Amanda Dilbeck (With attachments) (Carr, Michael)
October 27, 2021 Filing 11 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Sterling E Pratt on behalf of Instant Brands, Inc. [Note: Attorney Sterling E Pratt added to party Instant Brands, Inc.(pty:dft).] (Pratt, Sterling)
October 27, 2021 Filing 10 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by C William Threlkeld on behalf of Instant Brands, Inc. [Note: Attorney C William Threlkeld added to party Instant Brands, Inc.(pty:dft).] (Threlkeld, C)
October 25, 2021 Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (identifying: Corporate Parent Instant Brands Holding Inc for Instant Brands, Inc.) by Instant Brands, Inc. (Schrag, Jeremy)
October 18, 2021 Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing Instant Brands, Inc. to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCvP 7.1 within seven (7) days of this order, if they have not already done so. The parties shall use the form entitled Corporate Disclosure Statement available on the Courts website (please do not refile if already filed on non-court form unless directed to do so). If you have already filed your Corporate Disclosure Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Corporate Disclosure Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (bjb, Dpty Clk)
October 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER by Judge Gregory K Frizzell granting Defendant's Motion for Extension [Doc. 6]; setting its answer or other responsive pleading deadline to 10/28/2021. ; granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (lah, Chambers)
October 14, 2021 Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer (Re: #2 Complaint ) by Instant Brands, Inc. (Schrag, Jeremy)
October 14, 2021 Filing 5 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Jeremy Keith Schrag on behalf of Instant Brands, Inc. [Note: Attorney Jeremy Keith Schrag added to party Instant Brands, Inc.(pty:dft).] (Schrag, Jeremy)
September 21, 2021 Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued by Court Clerk as to Instant Brands, Inc. (ll, Dpty Clk)
September 21, 2021 Filing 3 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Michael E Carr on behalf of Amanda Dilbeck (Carr, Michael)
September 21, 2021 Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Instant Brands, Inc. (paid $402 filing fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2481130) by Amanda Dilbeck (Carr, Michael)
September 21, 2021 Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Amanda Dilbeck (Carr, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dilbeck v. Instant Brands, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amanda Dilbeck
Represented By: Michael E Carr
Represented By: Adam A Milasincic
Represented By: Robert E Ammons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Instant Brands, Inc.
Represented By: C William Threlkeld
Represented By: Jeremy Keith Schrag
Represented By: Sterling E Pratt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?