Alexander v. State of Oklahoma, The
| Chelcie Alexander and Chelcie Cheyenne Keigh Alexander |
| State of Oklahoma, The |
| 4:2022cv00497 |
| November 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| John F Heil |
| Susan E Huntsman |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MAIL to Chelcie Alexander Returned - address has been changed to address unknown. (Re: #3 Judgment, Entering Judgment, #2 Order,, Dismissing/Terminating Case,, Denying Certificate of Appealability,, Ruling on Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241/2254), ) (ll, Dpty Clk) |
| ***Civil Case Terminated (see document number #3 ) (sc, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 3 JUDGMENT by Chief Judge John F Heil, III , entering judgment in favor of Respondent against Petitioner (terminates case) (JFH1, Chambers) |
Filing 2
ORDER by Chief Judge John F Heil, III ; dismissing/terminating case (terminates case) ; denying certificate of appealability; dismissing #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241/2254) (Re: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241 ) (Documents Terminated: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241 ) (JFH1, Chambers)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241 by Chelcie Alexander (lmt, Dpty Clk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
