Cooper v. Miller et al
Rodney Cooper, II |
David Miller, Lt Howard, Mr Bernard, J Stevenson, Mr Myall, Sgt Jones and Sgt Harrall |
5:2007cv00112 |
January 29, 2007 |
US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Oklahoma City Office |
Caddo |
Gary M. Purcell |
David L. Russell |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 6 with regard to Judge Purcell's recommendation that the case be dismissed against Dr. Dirham and the GEO Group Inc. The Report and Recommendation is otherwise rejected in light of Plaintiff's clar ifications in the event that Plaintiff file a timely amended complaint. The matter is hereby recommitted to Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell. Dr Dirham and GEO Group Inc terminated.Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell.. Signed by Judge David L. Russell on 2/14/07. (kw, ) |
Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Complaint filed by Rodney Cooper, II. It is recommended that the cause of action against Dfts Sgt. Jones, Dr. Dirham, and The GEO Group, Inc. be dism pur to 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B) for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted under 42 USC 1983 as to these Dfts. Objections to R&R due by 2/20/2007. This R&R partially disposes of issues ref to the undersigned Judge in the captioned matter. Signed by Judge Gary M. Purcell on 1/31/07. (dm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.