Bradford v. Currid et al
Kevin Bradford |
John Currid, Chris Hopingardmer, David Medrano, Greer County Jail and Mangum City of |
5:2015cv00606 |
June 2, 2015 |
US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Oklahoma City Office |
Greer |
Shon T. Erwin |
David L. Russell |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 57 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 44 Report and Recommendation, as more fully set out. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 9/8/16. (jw) |
Filing 19 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 16 Report and Recommendation. the Court will strike Document No. 18, which was improperly filed without leave, and grant Plaintiff until January 15, 2016, to file an amended complaint wherein he mu st set out clearly who he intends to sue and the facts supporting his claims against each of the intended defendants. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of his claims and no additional leave to amend. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and the matter is referred to Judge Erwin for additional proceedings. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 12/15/15. (jw) |
Filing 13 ORDER denying 10 Motion for Order; adopting Report and Recommendations re 11 Report and Recommendation. This matter is re-referred to Judge Erwin for additional proceedings. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint no later than November 18, 2015.. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 10/28/2015. (md) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.