Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Talley v. Shapiro et al
as 3:2022cv01997
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
Josh Shapiro, Kevin Bradford, Attorney General's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Talley v. Attorney General's Office et al
as 1:2022cv01970
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
Attorney General's Office, Josh Shapiro, Kevin Bradford and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
TALLEY v. SHAPIRO et al
as 2:2022cv05018
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Defendant:
JOSH SHAPIRO, ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE, KEVIN BRADFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TALLEY v. SHAPIRO et al
as 2:2022cv05019
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Defendant:
JOSH SHAPIRO, KEVIN BRADFORD, ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Talley v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2022cv01712
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, PA Dept. of Corrections, Lt. Jankoviak and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Talley v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv01711
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
United States of America, Judge Timothy J. Savage, John E. Wetzel and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Bradford v. Currid et al
as 5:2015cv00606
Plaintiff:
Kevin Bradford
Defendant:
John Currid, Chris Hopingardmer, David Medrano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv05762
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, JEFFREY A. BEARD, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv14334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Nixon v. Bradford
as 4:2008cv00062
Plaintiff:
Frank Nixon and Frank Nixon
Defendant:
Kevin Bradford
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
