Martinez v. Royal
||Mica Alexander Martinez
||November 8, 2016
||US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
||Oklahoma City Office
||Timothy D. DeGiusti
||Gary M. Purcell
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 2254
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|March 26, 2019
ORDER denying as moot 39 Respondents' Motion to Stay Case; denying 40 Respondent's Motion for Reconsideration; denying 41 Respondent's Motion to Certify Interlocutory Appeal. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 3/26/2019. (mb)
|January 2, 2019
ORDER granting 17 Motion for Discovery; granting 29 Motion for Hearing. Because the Court can resolve the adequacy issue as a matter of law, anevidentiary hearing is not warranted on that issue. But Petitioners request for an evidentiary hearin g on the issue of whether he can establish cause and prejudice to avoid the procedural bar of Ground One of his petition, is GRANTED.8 The Court will hold a scheduling conference with counsel for the parties to establish a schedule for discovery. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 1/2/2019. (mb)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?