Cases
Coddington, et al v. Crow, et al
as 22-6100
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMES A. CODDINGTON, BENJAMIN R. COLE, CARLOS CUESTA-RODRIGUEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee: SCOTT CROW, RANDY CHANDLER, BETTY GESELL and others
Grant, et al v. Crow, et al
as 22-6012
Plaintiff / Appellant: DONALD ANTHONY GRANT and GILBERT RAY POSTELLE
Plaintiff: JAMES A. CODDINGTON, BENJAMIN R. COLE, CARLOS CUESTA-RODRIGUEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee: SCOTT CROW, RANDY CHANDLER, BETTY GESELL and others
Grant, et al v. Crow, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-6139
Plaintiff / Appellant: JULIUS D. JONES, DONALD ANTHONY GRANT, GILBERT RAY POSTELLE and others
Plaintiff: JAMES A. CODDINGTON, BENJAMIN R. COLE, CARLOS CUESTA-RODRIGUEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee: SCOTT CROW, RANDY CHANDLER, BETTY GESELL and others
Grant, et al v. El Habti, et al
as 21-6129
Plaintiff: JOHN M. GRANT, JAMES A. CODDINGTON, BENJAMIN R. COLE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: JULIUS D. JONES, DONALD ANTHONY GRANT and GILBERT RAY POSTELLE
Defendant / Appellee: SCOTT CROW, RANDY CHANDLER, BETTY GESELL and others
Defendant: STEVE BURRAGE, EDWARD EVANS, Warden, KEVIN J. GROSS and others
Lay, et al v. El Habti, et al
as 21-6101
Plaintiff / Appellant: WADE LAY
Not Yet Classified: BRENDA E. ANDREW, JAMES A. CODDINGTON, BENJAMIN R. COLE and others
Plaintiff: NICHOLAS ALEXANDER DAVIS, SHELTON D. JACKSON, JULIUS D. JONES and others
Defendant / Appellee: ABOUTANAA EL HABTI, Warden, Mabel Bassett Correctional Center, in her official capacity, SCOTT CROW, Director, ODOC, in his official capacity, RANDY CHANDLER and others
Defendant: JOE M. ALLBAUGH, IV TEAM LEADER, IV TEAM MEMBERS#1-10 and others
Amicus Curiae: ALL NON-PARTY PLAINTIFFS, EXCEPT WADE LAW
Martinez v. Royal We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv01278
Petitioner: Mica Alexander Martinez
Respondent: Terry Royal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?