Gravitt v. Allbaugh et al
Jerad Keith Gravitt |
Joe M Allbaugh and Carl Bear |
5:2019cv00551 |
June 18, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Shon T Erwin |
David L Russell |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply; Petitioner is granted until September 16, 2019 to file a Reply to the Respondent's Response. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin on 8/15/19. (mc) |
Filing 11 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #6 Order, by Jerad Keith Gravitt. Motions referred to Shon T. Erwin. (Fisher, Jack) |
Filing 10 STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED - CONVENTIONAL FILING by Carl Bear re #8 Notice of Conventional Filing. (nv) |
Filing 9 ENTRY of Appearance by Caroline EJ Hunt on behalf of Carl Bear (Hunt, Caroline) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Conventional Filing of Court Record by Caroline EJ Hunt on behalf of Carl Bear (Hunt, Caroline) |
Filing 7 RESPONSE re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus,,, filed by Carl Bear. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - OCCA DA Decision, #2 Exhibit 2 - Briefs, #3 Exhibit 3 - State DA Response Br, #4 Exhibit 4 - Order, #5 Exhibit 5 - PC App, #6 Exhibit 6 - State Response to PC App, #7 Exhibit 7 - Order Denying PC App, #8 Exhibit 8 - PC Appeal Petition in Error, #9 Exhibit 9 - PC Appeal Brief in Support, #10 Exhibit 10 - OCCA Order affirming denial of PC Relief, #11 Exhibit 11 - Relevant Transcript Pages, #12 Exhibit 12 - RELEVANT OR PAGES)(Hunt, Caroline) |
Filing 6 ORDER FOR RESPONSE BY OKLAHOMA ATTORNEY GENERAL TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY A PERSON IN STATE CUSTODY, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 2254. The Respondent shall file an answer responding to the allegations of the petition within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin on 7/3/19. (mc) |
Filing 5 Receipt for Money Received from Jerad Keith Gravitt in the amount of $5.00, receipt number OKW500074634 regarding #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (nv) |
Filing 4 ENTER ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin. Entered by the direction of the Honorable David L. Russell on 6/19/19. (ac) |
Filing 3 ENTER ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Honorable David L. Russell for all further proceedings. Honorable Robin J. Cauthron no longer assigned to case. Signed by Honorable Robin J. Cauthron on 6/19/19. (ac) |
Filing 2 PREVIOUS Cases (ac) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jerad Keith Gravitt. (Attachments: #1 ATTACHMENT 1 - CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE, #2 ATTACHMENT 2 - GRAVITT FINAL CIVIL COVER SHEET WDOK, #3 ATTACHMENT 3 SUMMARY OPINION OCCA GRAVIT DIRECT APPEAL, #4 ATTACHMENT 4- EXHIBIT TWO OKLA UNIFORM INSTR (OUJI) VOLUNTARY INTOXICATION, #5 ATTCHMENT 5 - EXHIBIT THREE DR LIPMAN AMENDED AFFIDAVIT AND REPORT AND CV, #6 ATTACHMENT 6 EXHIBIT FOUR AFFIDAVIT OF ANDREA MILLER, #7 ATTACHMENT 7 AFFIDAVIT OF WILLIAM FOSTER, #8 ATTACHMENT 8 - OK COUNTY JERAD GRAVITT WEIUGHT HEIGHT AT BOOK IN, #9 ATTACHMENT 9 - EXHIBIT 7 DR LIPMAN BLOOD LEVEL MEMORANDUM, #10 ATTACHMENT 10 - 7-23-18 ORDER DENYING APPLICATION FOR POST CONVICTION RELIEF, #11 ATTACHMENT 11 - TRANSCRIPT EVID HEARING OK COUNTY DIST CT 4-16-18, #12 ATTACHMENT 12 - 4-5-19 OCCA ORDER DENYING POST-COINVICTION RELIEF APPEAL, #13 ATTACHENT 13 4-27-17 ORDER DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE)(ac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.