Cases 1 - 10 of 149
Pink v. Harpe et al
as 6:2024cv00393
Petitioner:
Johnny L Hardeman and Lo Re Pink
Respondent:
Steven Harpe, Carl Bears, Nona Battles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pink v. Harpe et al
as 5:2024cv00969
Defendant:
Nona Battles, R Gulbert, Tommy Sharp and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny L Hardeman and Lo Re Pink
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2023cv01141
Plaintiff:
Carey M King, Tearra King, Deoyon Janae Moore and others
Defendant:
Charles King, Cannady Paries, Deoyonte Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-6116
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICKEY WHITE
Respondent / Appellee:
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and CARL BEAR
White v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-6085
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICKEY WHITE
Respondent / Appellee:
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and CARL BEAR, Deputy Director
White v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv00528
Petitioner:
Rickey White
Respondent:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections and Carl Bear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-6075
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICKEY WHITE
Respondent / Appellee:
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and CARL BEAR, Deputy Director
White v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv00156
Petitioner:
Rickey White
Respondent:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections and Carl Bear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state)
Clervrain et al v. Lankford et al
as 5:2022cv00283
Plaintiff:
Biglauwick Plaisimond, Manetirony Clervrain, Wesline Casir and others
Defendant:
James Lankford, Jim Inhofe, Stephanie Bice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.