Pope v. Martin et al
Plaintiff: Maurice Larry Pope
Defendant: Jimmy Martin and NFCC
Case Number: 5:2021cv00232
Filed: March 18, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Robin J Cauthron
Referring Judge: Gary M Purcell
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended Plaintiff's action Doc #1 re Complaint be dismissed without prejudice based on his failure to pay the filing fee and/or comply with the Court's orders. Objections to R&R due by 5/25/2021. This Report and Recommendation disposes of all issues referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge in the captioned matter, and any pending motion not specifically addressed herein is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell on 5/5/2021. (cps)
May 5, 2021 Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell no longer assigned to case. (cps)
April 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Plaintiff is directed to show cause through a written submission to the Court, no later than April 29, 2021, why this case should not be dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee or file an Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Failure to fully comply with this Order may result in the dismissal of this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell on 4/15/2021. (cps)
March 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TO PLAINTIFF TO CURE DEFICIENCY. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall cure the deficiencies designated above by the 9th day of April, 2021. Otherwise, the Court will recommend dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell on 3/22/2021. (cps)
March 19, 2021 Filing 4 ENTER ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell. Entered by the direction of Honorable Robin J. Cauthron on 03/19/2021. (knt)
March 19, 2021 Filing 3 ENTER ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Honorable Robin J. Cauthron for all further proceedings. Honorable Jodi W. Dishman no longer assigned to case. Entered by the direction of Honorable Jodi W. Dishman on 03/19/2021. (knt)
March 18, 2021 Filing 2 PREVIOUS Cases. (knt)
March 18, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jimmy Martin, NFCC filed by Maurice Larry Pope. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 - Affidavit in Forma Pauperis, #2 Envelope)(knt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pope v. Martin et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maurice Larry Pope
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jimmy Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NFCC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?