Scott v. LNU
Petitioner: Samuel Nathaniel Scott
Respondent: FNU LNU and Luke Pettigrew
Case Number: 5:2022cv00605
Filed: July 20, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Amanda Maxfield Green
Referring Judge: Bernard M Jones
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 12, 2022 Filing 10 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #9 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Amended) by Samuel Nathaniel Scott. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dtb)
September 12, 2022 Filing 9 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Amended) terminating FNU LNU adding Luke Pettigrew filed by Samuel Nathaniel Scott. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dtb)
August 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File.The Petitioner has until September 13, 2022, to cure the deficiencies listed in the Order to Cure dated July 26, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda Maxfield Green on 8/23/2022. (rb)
August 19, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time by Samuel Nathaniel Scott. Motions referred to Amanda Maxfield Green. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(km)
July 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER to Cure Deficiencies. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda Maxfield Green on 7/26/2022. (rb)
July 21, 2022 Filing 5 ENTER ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Amanda Maxfield Green. Entered at the direction of Judge Bernard M. Jones on 07/21/2022. (km)
July 21, 2022 Filing 4 ENTER ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Bernard M. Jones for all further proceedings. Judge Scott L. Palk no longer assigned to case. Entered at the direction of Judge Scott L. Palk on 07/21/2022. (km)
July 21, 2022 Filing 3 PREVIOUS Cases. (km)
July 20, 2022 Filing 2 FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT by Samuel Nathaniel Scott. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(km)
July 20, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Samuel Nathaniel Scott. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Certificate of Degree of Indian Blood, #2 Exhibit 2 - Order Affirming Denial of Post-Conviction Relief, #3 Exhibit 3 - OSCN Case Details PC-2021-1085, #4 Exhibit 4 - CF-2001-375 Request to Transmit Appeal Records, #5 Exhibit 5 - CF-01-375 Petition in Error, #6 Exhibit 6 - CF-2001-375 Notice of Intent to Appeal, #7 Exhibit 7 - Order Denying Application for Post-Conviction Relief, #8 Exhibit 8 - CF-01-375 Indian Country Jurisdictional Docket, #9 Exhibit 9 - CF-01-375 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #10 Envelope)(km)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scott v. LNU
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Samuel Nathaniel Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: FNU LNU
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Luke Pettigrew
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?