Evans et al v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Deb Evans, Clarence Adams, Richard Brown, Twyla Brown, Craig McLaughlin, Sharon Gow, Niskanen Center, Bill Gow, Stacey McLaughlin, Ron Schaaf and Stephany Adams |
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission |
1:2019cv00766 |
May 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Mark D Clarke |
Freedom of Information Act |
05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 5 Answer to #1 Complaint,, . Filed by Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. (Danielson, Kevin) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically as to Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (jkm) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $400 collected. Agency Tracking ID: 0979-5851188 Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1. Jury Trial Requested: No. Filed by Craig McLaughlin, Ron Schaaf, Sharon Gow, Stacey McLaughlin, Clarence Adams, Richard Brown, Niskanen Center, Deb Evans, Twila Brown, Bill Gow against Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Attachment). (Moro, Tonia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.