Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Deb Evans, et al v. FERC
as 20-35661
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DEB EVANS, CLARENCE ADAMS, TWYLA BROWN and others
Defendant / Appellant:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Deborah Evans, et al v. FERC
as 20-1161
Petitioner:
Bill Gow, Ron Schaaf, Sharon Gow and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Evans et al v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
as 1:2019cv00766
Plaintiff:
Deb Evans, Clarence Adams, Richard Brown and others
Defendant:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
McLaughlin v. Helder et al
as 5:2019cv05085
Defendant:
Deputy Clinton McCarver, Corporal Justin Edens, Sergeant Carlos Pineda and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Craig McLaughlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLERMONT v. SOOTER et al
as 1:2019cv00314
Defendant:
JAKE FERRER, RICCARDO MARTINEZ, DEVIN COOPER and others
Plaintiff:
EMIL CLERMONT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merle Janes, et al v. Peter Harris, et al
as 09-35640
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MERLE JANES, MD, a physician licensed in the State of Washington, JOHN DOE, as individuals and as Class Representatives under FRCP 23, JANE DOES, A and B, as individuals and as Class Representatives under FRCP 23 and others
Defendant - Appellant:
PETER J. HARRIS, GEORGE HEYE, MD, ERIN OBENLUND and others
Merle Janes, et al v. Peter Harris, et al
as 09-35602
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MERLE JANES, MD, a physician licensed in the State of Washington, JOHN DOE, as individuals and as Class Representatives under FRCP 23, JANE DOES, A and B, as individuals and as Class Representatives under FRCP 23 and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PETER J. HARRIS, GEORGE HEYE, MD, ERIN OBENLUND and others
Janes et al v. Harris et al
as 2:2008cv00200
Plaintiff:
Merle Janes, John Doe, Jane Does A and B and others
Defendant:
Peter J Harris, George Heye, Erin Obenland and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
