Student v. Medford School District
Plaintiff: Student
Defendant: Medford School District 549C and Medford School District
Case Number: 1:2022cv01262
Filed: August 25, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Mark D Clarke
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Education
Cause of Action: 20 U.S.C. ยง 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 20, 2022 Filing 11 Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge.
October 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 RECORD OF ORDER by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke: SETTING a telephonic Rule 16 Conference for 12/05/2022 at 10:00 AM. Conference call information will be provided in a separate entry. At the time of the Conference, parties should have their calendars available to discuss scheduling matters, including modification of the current case deadlines, joining additional parties and amending the pleadings, dispositive motions, and setting a trial date. The parties shall consult pursuant to FRCP 26(f) regarding a focused and proportional discovery plan prior to the Conference. A written report is not required. However, the parties should be prepared to briefly summarize the issues in the case and give the Court a realistic picture of what discovery needs to be completed. The ultimate goal of the discovery plan shall be "the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination" of the action. FRCP 1. If depositions are anticipated, the parties should confer prior to the Conference and have a firm date for the depositions scheduled prior to the conference. Parties shall confer prior to the Conference and consider whether the case could benefit from a streamlined approach, utilizing limited discovery and early dispositive motions, settlement conference, or an expedited trial date. Finally, if the parties intend to file written consents (these need to be filed separately on the docket by each party and not combined in a Joint Status Report) to a magistrate judge, it would be helpful to do so prior to the Rule 16 Conference, particularly if they want to secure a firm trial date. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm)
October 11, 2022 Filing 9 Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) Agreement for Discovery. Filed by Student. (Wiscarson, Diane)
October 11, 2022 Filing 8 Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge.
October 11, 2022 Filing 7 Response Apellant's Response to Motion to Stay. Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Wiscarson, Diane)
September 15, 2022 Filing 6 Motion for Stay . Filed by Medford School District. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Supporting Memorandum, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 3) (Cohn-Lee, Richard)
September 15, 2022 Filing 5 Answer to #1 Complaint, . Filed by Medford School District. (Cohn-Lee, Richard)
August 29, 2022 Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically as to Medford School District. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (jkm)
August 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Scheduling Order regarding Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order, #2 . Consent to Jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge, if any, is to be filed by 12/27/2022. Dispositive Motions are due by 1/26/2023. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (jkm)
August 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 12/27/2022. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 1/26/2023. Pretrial Order is due by 1/26/2023. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (jkm)
August 25, 2022 Filing 1 Complaint. For Attorneys' Fees and Expenses and Costs Filing fee in the amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8632728 Jury Trial Requested: No. Filed by Student against Medford School District 549C (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit). (Wiscarson, Diane)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Student v. Medford School District
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Student
Represented By: Diane F. Wiscarson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Medford School District 549C
Represented By: Nancy J. Hungerford
Represented By: Richard G. Cohn-Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Medford School District
Represented By: Nancy J. Hungerford
Represented By: Richard G. Cohn-Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?