Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01366
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Johnson v. County of Suffolk et al
as 2:2022cv01355
Plaintiff:
Shakeerah Johnson
Defendant:
County of Suffolk, Suffolk County Police Department, Janine Musmacker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe et al v. Medford School District 549C et al
as 1:2019cv01395
Defendant:
Chellie Stoffell, Medford School District 549C, Megan Young and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Warner, John Doe and Chris Warner
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Doe et al v. Medford School District 549C et al
as 1:2019cv01393
Defendant:
Chellie Stoffell, Medford School District 549C, Megan Young and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Warner, John Doe and Chris Warner
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Nicolino v. Patchogue-Medford School District et al
as 2:2012cv01994
Defendant:
Brett P. Houdek, Neil Katz, William Lavelle and others
Plaintiff:
Dr. Peter A. Nicolino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe et al v. Medford School District 549C et al
as 1:2010cv03113
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, Jane Doe, 2 and Jane Doe, 3
Defendant:
Chris Gilman, Sallie Johnson, Phil Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pamela Dale v. Medford School District 549c, et al
as 1:2007cv03016
Plaintiff:
Pamela Dale and Pamela Dale
Defendant:
Medford School District 549C, William Rowan, Donald Frazier and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
