Williams v. Grant County et al
Plaintiff: Douglas Williams
Defendant: Michael Alley, Jackson Derosier, Grant County and Sheriff Glenn Palmer
Case Number: 2:2015cv01760
Filed: September 17, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Pendleton (2) Office
Presiding Judge: Patricia Sullivan
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 81 OPINION AND ORDER: The Court GRANTS defendants Motion for Summary Judgment, and DISMISSES this action with prejudice. (See 6 page opinion for more information.) Signed on 2/28/18 by Magistrate Judge Patricia Sullivan. (Mailed copy to plaintiff) (dsg)
August 25, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 70 OPINION AND ORDER: The Court GRANTS defendants' Motion to Compel 68 . Plaintiff shall answer defendants' First Set of Interrogatories and produce documents responsive to their First Request for Production. Signed on 8/25/17 by Magistrate Judge Patricia Sullivan. (Mailed order to plaintiff) (dsg)
April 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 61 OPINION AND ORDER:Defendants have not met their burden in moving to dismiss for failure to prosecute. Defendants essentially complain of a discovery dispute, which they have not sought to remedy through the appropriate discovery dispute resol ution procedures. The governing five-factor analysis strongly weighs against dismissal. Thus, the Court DENIES defendants Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution 45 . (See 7 page opinion for more information.) Signed on 4/6/17 by Magistrate Judge Patricia Sullivan. (Mailed copy to plaintiff) (dsg)
September 12, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS: The Court DENIES defendants' Motion to Dismiss 21 . Signed on 9/12/16 by Magistrate Judge Patricia Sullivan. (dsg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Grant County et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Alley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jackson Derosier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Grant County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sheriff Glenn Palmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Douglas Williams
Represented By: Lynn S. Walsh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?