Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 174
Olsauskas et al v. Minto Development Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv03764
Plaintiff: Lina Olsauskas, Marquetta Williams, Jonathan Williams and others
Defendant: Minto Development Corporation, Benhti Economic Development Corporation, Douglas William Isaacson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Buster v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00538
Plaintiff: Douglas William Buster
Defendant: John Doe and Jane Joe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Douglas Vance
as 24-5252
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: DOUGLAS WILLIAM VANCE
USA v. Douglas Williams
as 24-5230
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: DOUGLAS WILLIAMS
(PC) Williams v. Sheriff Department, Sacramento
as 2:2024cv00673
Plaintiff: Kirk Douglas Williams
Defendant: Sheriff Department, Sacramento
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Singletary v. Reed et al
as 6:2024cv00718
Plaintiff: Douglas W Singletary and Douglas Williams Singletary
Defendant: Officer FNU Reed and Officer FNU McClary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
USA v. Douglas Williams
as 24-5121
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: DOUGLAS WILLIAMS
Williams v. Cache County, et al
as 24-4015
Plaintiff: DOUGLAS WILLIAMS, an individual
Defendant: CACHE COUNTY, a public politic, D. CHAD JENSEN, individually and in his official capacity as Cache County Sheriff, LOWER FOODS, a Utah corporation and others
Williams v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02001
Petitioner: Webster Douglas Williams, III and Webster D. Williams
Respondent: Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05240
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?