Scott v. Myrick et al
||Everett James Scott
||Dr. Leland Beamer, Christopher P. DiGulio, Linda Gruenwald, Shannon Johnston, Dr. Tim Kelly, John Myrick, Dr. Ben Norton, Dr. Steven Shelton and B. Whelan
||April 12, 2016
||US District Court for the District of Oregon
||Pendleton (2) Office
||Youlee Yim You
|Nature of Suit:
||Prisoner: Civil Rights
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|December 8, 2017
OPINION AND ORDER: Upon review, I agree with Judge You's recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R 77 as my own opinion. Defendants' Partial Motion for Summary Judgment 58 and Motion for Summary Judgment 63 are GRANTED. Signed on 12/8/17 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Everett Scott, Prisoner ID: 3508819) (dsg)
|August 31, 2017
ORDER: Plaintiff's "Motion for Preliminary Injunction" (ECF No. 29 ), Motion for Contempt of Court (ECF No. 44 ), and Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (ECF No. 54 ) are DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion to Enter Document s into Plaintiff's Evidentiary Discovery File (ECF No. 40 ), Motion to Correct Discovery File Record (ECF No. 45 ), Motion to Correct Discovery Record and Enter Further Documents into the Record (ECF No. 57 ), and Motion to Correct Discovery Record (ECF No. 62 ) are GRANTED to the extent that the documents included therewith are construed as plaintiff's additional exhibits for the purposes of this case and otherwise DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 8/31/2017 by Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (pvh)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?