Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Cardenas v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv01007
Plaintiff:
Demecio Cardenas
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Warren Roberts, Dr. Leland Beamer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCarter v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2024cv00900
Plaintiff:
Timothy McCarter
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Robyn Rosenfield, Dr. Leland Beamer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bartmess v. Beamer et al
as 6:2023cv01930
Plaintiff:
Shawn Michael Bartmess
Defendant:
Dr. Leland Beamer, Dr. Karen Harris, Dr. Benjamin Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
McCarter v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2023cv00698
Plaintiff:
Timothy McCarter
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Robyn Rosenfield, Dr. Leland Beamer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2018cv00144
Defendant:
Nicolas Arrendondo, Dr. Leland Beamer, RN J. Bradford and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth G. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCright v. Beamer et al
as 2:2017cv00942
Defendant:
5 John and 5 Jane Does, Dr. Leland Beamer, J. Dafoe and others
Plaintiff:
Larry McCright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gosney v. Gower et al
as 6:2016cv01072
Defendant:
Dr. Leland Beamer, Dr. Daniel Dewsnup, Dr. C. DiGiulio and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Allen Gosney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Myrick et al
as 2:2016cv00618
Defendant:
Dr. Leland Beamer, Christopher P. DiGulio, Linda Gruenwald and others
Plaintiff:
Everett James Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reuther v. Fuzi et al
as 3:2013cv02123
Defendant:
Dr. Leland Beamer, Dr. Daniel Dewsnup, Dr. Christopher P. DiGuilio and others
Plaintiff:
Scot Alan Reuther
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
