Bauer v. Washburn et al
| Kirk Michael Bauer |
| Captain Frazier, Ms. Kelly Rath, Sue Washburn, C/O Oblisk, Ms. Lilenthal, Mr. Maxey, Lt. Duchek, Ms. Bolles, Tom Lemens, Heidi Stedard, Captain Lilienthal, Captain LaGore, C/O Galle, C/O Hunter, Ms. Hogge, Clark, Ms. Nina Sobotta, Captain Walker, C/O Dirksen, Captain Carey, Bridgette Amsberry, C/O Murray, Ms. Bomberger, Litzinger, Captain Mary Tangney, C/O Sauer, Lt. Hogeland, Dome Building in Salem, Oregon and S. Murphy |
| 2:2019cv00655 |
| April 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| John V Acosta |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 4/30/19.) (dsg) |
| Filing 2 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. In forma pauperis pending. Filed by Kirk Michael Bauer against Bridgette Amsberry, Bolles, Bomberger, Carey, Clark, Dirksen, Dome Building in Salem, Oregon, Duchek, Frazier, Galle, Hogeland, Hogge, Hunter, LaGore, Tom Lemens, Lilenthal, Lilienthal, Litzinger, Maxey, S. Murphy, Murray, Oblisk, Kelly Rath, Sauer, Nina Sobotta, Heidi Stedard, Mary Tangney, Walker, Sue Washburn. (dsg) |
| Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Kirk Michael Bauer. (dsg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
