Johnson v. Kelly
| Joseph Johnson |
| Brandon Kelly |
| 2:2019cv01767 |
| November 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Karin J Immergut |
| Prisoner Petitions: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER: Granting Respondent's Motion for Extension of Time #9 . Answer is due by 3/9/2020. Ordered by Judge Karin J. Immergut. (ps2)
|
|
Filing 10
Declaration of Samuel A. Kubernick. Filed by Brandon Kelly. (Related document(s): Motion for Extension of Time to Answer a Complaint/Petition #9 .) (Kubernick, Samuel)
|
|
Filing 9
Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 2254 #1 . Filed by Brandon Kelly. (Kubernick, Samuel)
|
|
Filing 8
Notice of Attorney Substitution:Attorney Samuel A. Kubernick is substituted as counsel of record in place of Attorney Lynn David Larsen Filed by Brandon Kelly. (Larsen, Lynn)
|
|
Filing 7
Notice of Attorney Substitution:Attorney Kristina Hellman is substituted as counsel of record in place of Attorney Lisa Hay Filed by Joseph Johnson. (Hellman, Kristina)
|
|
Filing 6
Acceptance and Acknowledgment of Service of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Scheduling Order upon the State Attorney General on behalf of Brandon Kelly. Filed by Brandon Kelly. (Larsen, Lynn)
|
|
Filing 5
Habeas Corpus Scheduling Order Serving Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 2254 #1 on respondent. Answer is due by 1/7/2020. Signed on 11/7/2019 by Judge Karin J. Immergut. (Attachments: #1 Acceptance and Acknowledgment, #2 Petition) (dsg)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER: Petitioner brings this habeas corpus proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. This Court grants Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel #2 . The Federal Public Defender, 101 S.W. Main Street, Suite 1700, Portland, Oregon 97204, is appointed to represent petitioner in this proceeding. Signed on 11/7/2019 by Judge Karin J. Immergut. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 11/8/2019. Sent complaint and order to FPD via interoffice mail.) (dsg)
|
|
Filing 3
Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Karin J. Immergut. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 11/5/2019.) (dsg)
|
|
Filing 2
Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Filed by Joseph Johnson. (dsg)
|
|
Filing 1
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254 - State) Filing Fee in amount of $5.00 collected. Receipt No. 86239 issued. Filed by Joseph Johnson against Brandon Kelly. (dsg)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Johnson v. Kelly | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Joseph Johnson | |
| Represented By: | Lisa Hay |
| Represented By: | Kristina S. Hellman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Brandon Kelly | |
| Represented By: | Lynn David Larsen |
| Represented By: | Samuel A. Kubernick |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
