Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Gullens v. Raoul et al
as 1:2026cv09931
Plaintiff:
Darryl Gullens
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, Joseph Navarro, Jason Goode and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul v. Rayfield, et al.
as 26-4117
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL PAUL and Sam Paul
Defendant:
COLETTE S. PETERS, former Director, in her individual capacity, DAN RAYFIELD, Attorney General of Oregon, in his official capacity, MICHELLE ENFIELD, Assistant Attorney General, individually and in her official capacity and others
(PC) Taylor El v. Newsom et al
as 1:2026cv02816
Plaintiff:
Joe Alfred Taylor El
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, Jeff Macomber, Nathan Scaife and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2026cv00102
Plaintiff:
Jessie Brandon Kelly
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
General Counsel SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Zambrano v. Oregon Department of Corrections, et al.
as 26-1511
Defendant:
COLETTE S. PETERS, OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ODOC, OREGON CORRECTIONS ENTERPRISE, a semi-independent state agency and others
Plaintiff:
SERGIO MIGUEL ZAMBRANO
Mileham v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2026cv00445
Plaintiff:
Forge D. Mileham, Jr.
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Michael Reese, Collette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul v. Rayfield et al
as 3:2025cv02139
Plaintiff:
Samuel Paul and Sam Paul
Defendant:
Dan Rayfield, Michelle Enfield, Brandon Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Whitaker v. Steward, et al.
as 25-4260
Plaintiff:
Captain STEPHEN WHITAKER
Defendant:
HEIDI STEWARD, ACTING DIRECTOR, Acting Director, ODOC, STEVE ROBBINS, Chief Financial Officer, ODOC, BOB CULP, Central Trust Manager, ODOC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
