Heilman v. State of Oregon et al
Robert Heilman |
Rick Coursey, EOCI Cpt. Dalh, Doug Harder, EOCI CO. Lowell, State of Oregon and EOCI CO. Branstetter |
3:2011cv00594 |
May 16, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Portland Office |
Garr M. King |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 121 OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING SUPERINTENDENT COURSEY Signed on 4/12/2013 by Judge Garr M. King. (pc) |
Filing 90 OPINION AND ORDER: Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 77 is denied in part and granted in part. Officer Lowe is dismissed with prejudice. The remaining defendants should be prepared for trialon April 16, 2013. Signed on 2/6/2013 by Judge Garr M. King. (pc) |
Filing 57 OPINION AND ORDER: Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 20 is DENIED. Defendants' related Motion to Stay Discovery 23 is DENIED as moot. The Court will schedule a telephone conference to set a case schedule. Signed on 3/23/2012 by Judge Garr M. King. (pc) |
Filing 26 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel 18 is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to seek counsel from the Court's pro bono panel for the limited purpose of reviewing the case and determini ng whether to accept representation. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for service and to correct 19 is CONSTRUED IN PART as a motion to amend the complaint by interlineation to correct the spelling of Correctional Officer "Lowell&qu ot; to "Lowe." The motion is granted, and the complaint is amended by interlineation to correct the spelling error. Additionally, plaintiff's request for service of process on EOCI Correctional Officer Lowe is GRANTED. Defendants' motions for summary judgment 20 and to stay discovery 23 are held in abeyance pending review of this case by pro bono counsel. Signed on 9/27/2011 by Judge Garr M. King. (gw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.