Cases 1 - 10 of 130
Kenneth Williams v. Michael Simon, et al
as 20-35550
Defendant:
JOHN KITZHABOR, ANDREW HALLMAN, MOHAMED AHMED, Prisoner and others
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVE SHELTON, ODOC Health Serv. Mgr., FITZGERALD, C/O, RICK COURSEY, (EOCI) Supt. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH GREGORY WILLIAMS
Richard Pickett v. Rick Coursey
as 20-35247
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD PICKETT
Respondent / Appellee:
RICK COURSEY
Aaron Choat v. Rick Coursey
as 19-36044
Petitioner / Appellant:
AARON E. CHOAT
Respondent / Appellee:
RICK COURSEY, Superintendent, Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution, Person having custody of petitioner
Kenneth Williams v. ODOC, et al
as 19-35404
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL GOWER, Assistant Administrator at ODOC, LEONARD WILLIAMSON, Inspector General at ODOC, OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH GREGORY WILLIAMS
Dansby v. Amsberry et al
as 2:2018cv01606
Defendant:
Ms. R. Pace, Ms. Maine, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Yancey Dansby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Oregon Dept. of Corrections et al
as 6:2017cv01695
Defendant:
Rick Coursey, Michael Gower, Oregon Dept. of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Gregory Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mark Templeton v. Rick Coursey, et al
as 17-35637
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARK TEMPLETON
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK COURSEY and BRIGITTE AMSBERRY
Laird Hill v. Rick Coursey, et al
as 17-35551
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAIRD WAYNE HILL
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK COURSEY, Superintendent and EASTERN OREGON CORRECTIONS INSTITUTION
Glen Langford, Jr. v. Rick Coursey
as 17-35391
Petitioner - Appellant:
GLEN ALAN LANGFORD, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK COURSEY
Vidal Carrillo-Carrillo v. Rick Coursey
as 16-35670
Petitioner - Appellant:
VIDAL CARRILLO-CARRILLO
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK COURSEY, Superintendent, EOCI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
