A.G. et al v. Burroughs et al
| Jane and John Does 1-50, J. B., S. B., M. F., A. G., B. J., E. K., E. PD., K. R. and D. S. |
| Jane Doe Adoption Caseworker, Jane or John Doe Adoption Caseworker-Supervisor, Diane Bradley, Tanya Burroughs, Jane or John Doe Caseworker-Supervisors B 1-9, Jane or John Doe Caseworker-Supervisors D 1-50, Jane or John Doe Caseworkers A 1-9, Jane or John Caseworkers C 1-50, Jane Doe Certifier, Jane or John Doe Certifier-Supervisor 1, Jane or John Doe Certifier-Supervisor 2, Jane or John Doe Defendants 1-25, Judi Martin, James Earl Mooney and Oregon Department of Human Services (DHS) |
| 3:2013cv01051 |
| June 21, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland (3) Office |
| John V. Acosta |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
322
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acostas Amended Findings and Recommendation 313 . The Court, therefore, DENIES Plaintiffs Motion 221 to Certify a Class of Persons; DENIES as moot Plaintiffs Motion 230 for Default Judgment; DEN IES as moot Defendants Motion 183 to Strike; GRANTS Defendants Motion ( 183 for a More Definite Statement; and GRANTS in partand DENIES in part Defendants Motion 183 to Dismiss as stated in the attached Order. To clarify for Plaintiff the claims he may replead and thetime limit by which he may replead those claims, the Court requests the Magistrate Judge issue a case-management order. Signed on 09/03/2015 by Judge Anna J. Brown. See attached 4 page Order. (bb)
|
|
Filing
299
OPINION and ORDER on Plaintiffs' motion 282 to compel. Defendants shall provide its supplemental answers to the interrogatories as to which the court granted plaintiffs' motion within 21 days of the date of entry of this order. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 7th day of April, 2015, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (see full 8-page document attached to this entry for detailed rulings) (peg)
|
|
Filing
97
OPINION and ORDER - Plaintiffs motion to compel 90 is GRANTED,and the Oregon Employment Department is hereby ordered to comply with Plaintiffs February 21, 2014, subpoena. It is further ordered that all documents released pursuant to Plaintiffs sub poena be subject to this courts January 28, 2014, protective order. However, because the OED advanced a good-faith argument against production, the court awards no fees or costs to either party in connection with this motion or the OEDs resistence to Plaintiffs subpoena. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 7th day of May, 2014, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
|
|
Filing
86
OPINION and ORDER (revised). IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 28th day of January, 2014, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
