Cases 1 - 10 of 527
Wade v. U.S. Court of Appeals - Ninth Circuit Executive
as 3:2024mc80199
Defendant:
U.S. Court of Appeals - Ninth Circuit Executive
Plaintiff:
E. K. Wade
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
E. K. B., et al. v. City of Azusa, et al.
as 24-3667
Plaintiff:
E. K. B., a minor, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem Nakisha Mitchell and NAKISHA MITCHELL, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Jerome Rory Barber
Defendant:
CITY OF AZUSA, a public entity, MICHAEL BERTELSON, a public employee, DAVID AGUILAR, a public employee previously known as Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00933
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
E&K, LLC v. Littelfuse, Inc.
as 2:2024cv11045
Plaintiff:
E&K, LLC
Defendant:
Littelfuse, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Jackson v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 24-1771
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JACKSON
Defendant:
STATE OF NEVADA, in relation to The Nevada Department of Corrections, E K MCDANIEL, DWIGHT WALTER NEVEN and others
In Re: TikTok, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation
as 1:2024cv02110
Defendant:
Beijing Douyin Information Service Co. Ltd, Douyin Ltd., TikTok Inc and others
Not Yet Classified:
TikTok, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation
Plaintiff:
Anibeth Bravo, Katie Murphy, Artemis Buckley and others
Thomas Traumann
as 24-1470
Petitioner:
In re: THOMAS TRAUMANN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and GENE E. K. PRATTER, District Judge
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Aisha Bradley
as 24-1355
Petitioner:
In re: AISHA ASHA BRADLEY
Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUMMIT PARK EAST GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
Aisha Bradley
as 24-1356
Petitioner:
In re: AISHA ASHA BRADLEY
Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUMMIT PARK EAST GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.