Slayden et al v. Schulz Boat Company, Inc. et al
| Bruce Slayden and Nora Slayden |
| Schulz Boat Company, Inc., Walter A. Schulz, William Ramos and Thomas Quinlan |
| 3:2013cv02259 |
| December 19, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland (3) Office |
| John V. Acosta |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
Opinion and Order: The Court ADOPTS the portion of Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation 31 that addresses stand-alone personal jurisdiction over Defendants as to Plaintiffs' breach of contract claim. Although t he Court does not adopt the Findings and Recommendation with respect to the Court's personal jurisdiction over Defendants as to Plaintiffs' fraud claim, concludes it has personal jurisdiction over Defendants as to Plaintiff's fraud c laim, and, in the exercise of its discretion, retains pendent personal jurisdiction over Defendants as to Plaintiffs' breach-of-contract and negligence claims, the Court nevertheless ADOPTS the Findings and Recommendation with respect to transfe r of venue. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants' Motion 12 to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Motion to Transfer and TRANSFERS this matter to the District of Rhode Island. Signed on 01/16/2015 by Judge Anna J. Brown. See attached 12 page Opinion and Order for full text. (bb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
