Heilbrun v. Villianueva et al
Michael E. Heilbrun |
James Deacon, H. Giblin, L. Greenwald, J. Myrick, Steve Robbins, Unknown Officers, R. Vanderkooy, Heather Villianueva and B. Whelan |
3:2014cv01706 |
October 27, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Portland (3) Office |
Michael H. Simon |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 314 Opinion and Order - Defendants' motions for summary judgment (ECF 150 , 158 ) are GRANTED in part, and Plaintiff's cross-motions for summary judgment (ECF 267 , ECF 274 ) are DENIED. Plaintiff's Claims 1-13 (ECF 94 at 21-31) are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust available administrative remedies. Claim 14 (ECF 94 at 32-35) is DISMISSED. To the extent that Claims 4 (ECF 94 at 23-24), 6 (ECF 94 at 25), and 12 (ECF 94 at 29-30) are not duplicative of Pl aintiff's unexhausted claims, the Court GRANTS judgment for Defendants against these claims. The Court further finds that any appeal from this Opinion and Order would not be taken in good faith and Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status should be revoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Signed on 6/5/2017 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja) |
Filing 217 Opinion and Order - Plaintiff's "Motion to Continue Plaintiff on His Previous Regimen of Medical and Full Access to the Law Library" (Dkt. 189 ) is DENIED. Signed on 6/6/2016 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.