Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Rotish Singh v. Sue Washburn, et al
as 21-35032
Defendant / Appellee:
C. CLARKE, Food Service Coordinator, S. SHELTON, Medical Director, A. SMITH, Physical Plant Coordinator and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROTISH VIKASH SINGH
MYRICKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv46845
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY J MYRICKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(SS) Myrick v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv01659
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Pamala J. Myrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Myrick v. Alabama & Tennessee River Railway LLC et al
as 2:2019cv01417
Defendant:
CSX Transportation Inc, Omnitrax Inc and Alabama & Tennessee River Railway LLC
Plaintiff:
Donald J Myrick
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 20109
Jose De la Portilla v. J. Myrick
as 19-35646
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSE A. DE LA PORTILLA
Respondent / Appellee:
J. MYRICK, Superintendent-TRCI
Caplan v. POIRIER'S SERVICE CENTER, INC. et al
as 0:2018cv60287
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
POIRIER'S SERVICE CENTER, INC., JESSE J. MYRICK, SR and LINDA J. MYRICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Singh v. Gruenwald et al
as 2:2017cv00829
Defendant:
J. Dafoe, C. Dieter, S. Franke and others
Plaintiff:
Rotish Vikash Singh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hidden Creek, AKF LLC v. Myrick et al
as 2:2017cv00194
Defendant:
Danielle Myrick and Jamaa J. Myrick
Plaintiff:
Hidden Creek, AKF LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Singh v. Nichols et al
as 2:2016cv01957
Defendant:
C. Dieter, Steve Franke, Michael Gower and others
Plaintiff:
Rotish Vikash Singh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myrick v. Company of America
as 2:2016cv01496
Plaintiff:
Linda J Myrick
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
